This is perfect for presenting information that is spatially related. The major feature of Prezi is the ability to organise information spatially on a giant canvas, and zoom around. The canvas provides a spatial framework for organising information, but few presentations make use of it properly It’s a good start.) PowerPoint actually allows more high-end animation than Prezi, although Prezi’s transitions are easier to master.
Prezi allows smooth transitions between frames (as they call slides), but once one gets to a frame, try setting a motion path, animating a graph, or doing anything other than zooming in to another level… (Prezi added a simple fade-in animation, to use within frames. Prezi allows interesting transitions between frames, but within-frame animations are limitedĭone well, PowerPoint allows a significant range of sophisticated on-slide animation. Just as PowerPoint doesn’t work well when audiences read bullet-points for themselves and ignore the presenter, Prezi also doesn’t work well when audiences read bullet-points, however fancy the transitions between them.
Because most Prezis are created with a reader in mind, text is usually still used to convey messages – and so the problem of audiences being able to read for themselves is still present when using Prezi for presentations. Prezi easily allows the use of text, images, and insertion of videos. Text is still text, bullet points still don’t work For most though, Prezi is not the answer. We understand that in 2012 people don’t want to get up and present boring bullet points. We understand that people are bored of PowerPoint, unable to harness it for effective presentation design, and looking to avoid death by PowerPoint. We can use pretty much any presentation technology to create presentation visuals – from whiteboards and sketches to Keynote, Prezi, or anything else you can think of. Here at BrightCarbon, we like Prezi, and we are happy to use it.
0 kommentar(er)
